
Short-term kitKidde
442020 short-term charcoal radon test kit
- Lab fee included
Method: Charcoal
In home: 3 days
Locations and reports
EPA puts Contra Costa County in Zone 2, its middle radon zone, and most reported tests there come back low, though 8.8% of 285 (2008 to 2017, laboratory totals) reached 4 pCi/L. Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
8.8%
1.5 pts below CA
285 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
0.9pCi/L
Below action level
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
285
9th of 33 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 2
Moderate potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts 2 to 4 pCi/L indoors
Rank in California
22 of 33
Middle half
By share, of 33 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Contra Costa County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 0.9 pCi/L
Below 2 pCi/L
This result is below 2 pCi/L, the level at which EPA says a fix should be considered. Contra Costa County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Contra Costa County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
Contra Costa County is a
USGS geologic potential: Moderate across 74% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
Of 285 pre-mitigation tests reported to CDC, not homes in this area.
| Result band | Tests Measured | Share Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 pCi/L | 226 | 79.3% |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 34 | 11.9% |
| 4 pCi/L and above | 25 | 8.8% |
These are the 285 tests reported to CDC for Contra Costa County over 2008 to 2017 (laboratory totals), many from homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: they describe the county's reported tests, not this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2008 to 2017, laboratory. Measured data period: 2005 to 2017 (every CDC figure on file).
Contra Costa County, Compared
Contra Costa County reports fewer high tests than California overall. 8.8% of its 285 tests over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals were at or above 4 pCi/L. That is 1.5 points below the 10.3% pooled from 56 California counties.
Ordered from highest share down, it comes 22nd of 33 California counties with 30 or more tests for the same period. Nationally, every county with a figure for the same period pools to 35.7%; Contra Costa County sits 26.9 points below it.
Next door, the shares run from 6.7% in Alameda County to 15.8% in Solano County, with Sacramento County and Alameda County below Contra Costa County. The reported tests do not follow EPA's Zone 2 label for Contra Costa County (predicted average between 2 and 4 pCi/L): 8.8% of them reached 4 pCi/L, fewer than that label suggests.
Half the tests came in under 0.9 pCi/L and half over it; the single highest reached 17.6 pCi/L. The rest split 79.3% under 2 pCi/L and 11.9% from 2 to 4 (California: 76.8% and 12.9%).
CDC's ten-year totals for Contra Costa County went from 235 tests (2005 to 2014) to 285 (2008 to 2017), the share going from 5.5% to 8.8%.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Contra Costa County, Geology
USGS's geologic map splits Contra Costa County: 74.1% of its land is moderate radon potential and 21.8% low. The map puts 74.1% of Contra Costa County in the area it calls Southern Coast Ranges and 21.8% in Great Valley. USGS gives the first a radon index of 9, in the moderate band (9 to 11), and the second 8, in the low band (5 to 8).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Coast Ranges | Metamorphosed marine sedimentary rocks, ultramafic rocks, Triasic metamorphic rocks, Mesozoic granitic rocks, and a series of fault-bounded linear basins in which Teriary marine and continental sedimentary rocks were deposited. | Moderate | 9 | 74.1% |
| Great Valley | Quaternary alluvial gravel, sand, silt, clay. | Low | 8 | 21.8% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Across California 0.1% of the land is rated high; none of Contra Costa County's is. Of the 4 counties that border it, 1 has more moderate-potential ground, Alameda County the most at 98.5%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Contra Costa County, Local resources
Listed radon businesses with an address in Contra Costa County:
Discounted test kits can be purchased through our partner laboratory, Alpha Energy, for $14.95.
Listed radon professionals by town: Walnut Creek
The Radon Program certifies all radon service providers operating in California.
What it means
Contra Costa County, Questions
Over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, 8.8% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Contra Costa County, California were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 0.9 pCi/L. Of 33 California counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 21 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 10.3%.
Contra Costa County borders 4 counties: Alameda County, Solano County, San Joaquin County and Sacramento County.
Products
Contra Costa County, Products
In Contra Costa County, 8.8% of 285 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 10.3% pooled across California. In Zone 2 a short-term kit (2 to 90 days) is the quick first check in Contra Costa County; a long-term test tells the year-round average.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Explore
Contra Costa County, Bordering counties
15.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.9 pCi/L · 38 tests · 7.0 points above Contra Costa County
14.9%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.4 pCi/L · 74 tests · 6.1 points above Contra Costa County
7.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.9 pCi/L · 194 tests · 1.1 points below Contra Costa County
6.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.7 pCi/L · 478 tests · 2.1 points below Contra Costa County
Contra Costa County, Cities and towns
Contra Costa County's population has barely moved since 2020: 1,170,070 residents on July 1, 2025 against 1,166,249 then, by the Census Bureau's estimates. Packed into its land, that is 1,632 people per square mile. No town dominates: Concord, the largest, has 123,261 residents, 10.5% of the total. Together its 19 incorporated places hold 84.9% of those residents; the other 15.1% live outside any of them. CDC's 285 reported tests for 2008 to 2017 work out to 0.2 per 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), close to California's 0.2.
From Concord to Clayton, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Contra Costa County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concord | 123,261 | −1.6% | 10.5% |
| Antioch | 118,958 | +3.1% | 10.2% |
| Richmond | 114,861 | −1.1% | 9.8% |
| San Ramon | 86,209 | −0.3% | 7.4% |
| Pittsburg | 77,542 | +1.6% | 6.6% |
| Walnut Creek | 70,012 | −0.3% | 6.0% |
| Brentwood | 66,607 | +3.3% | 5.7% |
| Oakley | 47,583 | +9.4% | 4.1% |
| Danville | 43,302 | −0.6% | 3.7% |
| Martinez | 36,849 | −0.9% | 3.1% |
| Pleasant Hill | 34,017 | −1.6% | 2.9% |
| San Pablo | 31,678 | −1.4% | 2.7% |
19 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025).
Contra Costa County, Homes
Of Contra Costa County's 426,585 homes, 67% are detached houses, against 57% across California; 17% are in buildings of five or more homes. Half of its homes were built before 1978, close to California's 1976: 23% date from before 1960 and 18% from 2000 or later. 68% of occupied homes are lived in by their owner (California: 56%); in the rest a tenant can run a test, but a fix is the landlord's to make.
| Homes | Contra Costa County | California |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 426,585 | 14,532,683 |
| Detached houses | 67% | 57% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 17% | 24% |
| Mobile homes | 2% | 4% |
| Built before 1960 | 23% | 27% |
| Built since 2000 | 18% | 18% |
| Middle year built | 1978 | 1976 |
| Owner-occupied | 68% | 56% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.