
Short-term kit![]()
RA400 short-term liquid scintillation radon test kit, lab fee included
- Lab fee included
Method: Liquid scintillation
In home: 48 to 96 hours
Locations and reports
EPA puts Oscoda County in Zone 3, its lowest radon zone, and 18.5% of its 54 reported radon tests (2008 to 2017, laboratory totals) were at or above 4 pCi/L. Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
18.5%
8.4 pts below MI
54 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
2.1pCi/L
Below action level
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
54
81st of 82 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 3
Lower potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts under 2 pCi/L indoors
Rank in Michigan
35 of 82
Middle half
By share, of 82 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Oscoda County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 2.1 pCi/L
Between 2 and 4 pCi/L
This result is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. Oscoda County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Oscoda County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
USGS geologic potential: Low across 84% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
Of 54 pre-mitigation tests reported to CDC, not homes in this area.
| Result band | Tests Measured | Share Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 pCi/L | 25 | 46.3% |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 19 | 35.2% |
| 4 pCi/L and above | 10 | 18.5% |
These are the 54 tests reported to CDC for Oscoda County over 2008 to 2017 (laboratory totals), many from homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: they describe the county's reported tests, not this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2008 to 2017, laboratory. Measured data period: 2005 to 2017 (every CDC figure on file).
Oscoda County, Compared
Oscoda County's 54 reported tests over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals had a middle value of 2.1 pCi/L and a maximum of 7.4 pCi/L, and 18.5% reached 4 pCi/L. Michigan as a whole (83 Michigan counties, pooled) comes to 26.9%: 8.4 points higher than here.
Among its state's counties it ranks 35th of 82 Michigan counties with 30 or more tests for the same period. Statewide for the same period, Lenawee County reported the highest share (56.7%) and Muskegon County the lowest (3.2%).
Below the action level, 25 tests (46.3%) came in under 2 pCi/L, against 46.4% statewide, and 19 tests (35.2%) fell between 2 and 4, against 26.7% statewide. CDC's ten-year totals for Oscoda County went from 51 tests (2005 to 2014) to 54 (2008 to 2017), the share going from 17.6% to 18.5%.
EPA's 1993 zone map puts Oscoda County in Zone 3, a predicted county average under 2 pCi/L. USGS geology rates 84% of the county's land low radon potential.
Next door, the shares run from 6.2% in Crawford County to 38.2% in Otsego County, with Ogemaw County, Montmorency County and Alpena County below Oscoda County.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Oscoda County, State data
What Michigan's own agencies publish about radon tests in Oscoda County, with their period. These are not CDC's figures and are never added to them.
Michigan EGLE publishes its figures by ZIP code, not by county. These are the 6 ZIP codes that lie wholly or partly in Oscoda County, each with the state's own figures for it. Period: About 10 years to 2026-05-15.
| ZIP code | What the state reports |
|---|---|
| 48621 | 14% greater than 4 pCi/L, median 2.5 pCi/L, 7 tests |
| 48636 | 3 tests, figures not shown |
| 48647 | 25% greater than 4 pCi/L, median 1.3 pCi/L, 8 tests |
| 48654 | 0% greater than 4 pCi/L, median 0.0 pCi/L, 5 tests |
| 48728 | 3 tests, figures not shown |
| 49756 | 26% greater than 4 pCi/L, median 2.7 pCi/L, 31 tests |
Measured: Michigan EGLE data, About 10 years to 2026-05-15.
Oscoda County, Geology
Most of the ground under Oscoda County is one class on USGS's geologic map: 83.5% of its land is low radon potential, with 16.5% moderate. The map puts 83.5% of Oscoda County in the area it calls North-Central Michigan Basin and 16.5% in Antrim Shale. USGS gives the first a radon index of 8, in the low band (5 to 8), and the second 10, in the moderate band (9 to 11).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North-Central Michigan Basin | Sandy and silty glacial deposits derived from sandstones, gray shales, limestones, and dolomites. | Low | 8 | 83.5% |
| Antrim Shale | Glacial deposits dervied in part from Antrim black shale. | Moderate | 10 | 16.5% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Across Michigan 9.6% of the land is rated high; none of Oscoda County's is. Of the 8 counties that border it, 4 have more moderate-potential ground, Montmorency County the most at 97.9%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Oscoda County, Local resources
Michigan does not license or regulate radon testing and mitigation contractors.
What it means
Oscoda County, Questions
Over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, 18.5% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Oscoda County, Michigan were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 2.1 pCi/L. Of 82 Michigan counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 34 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 26.9%.
Oscoda County borders 8 counties: Montmorency County, Crawford County, Ogemaw County, Alcona County, Otsego County, Alpena County, Iosco County and Roscommon County.
Products
Oscoda County, Products
In Oscoda County, 18.5% of 54 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 26.9% pooled across Michigan. Zone 3 is the lowest label, yet homes at or above 4 pCi/L occur in every zone: a short-term kit (2 to 90 days) is the quick first check in Oscoda County.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Explore
Oscoda County, Bordering counties
38.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 3.2 pCi/L · 1,080 tests · 19.7 points above Oscoda County
20.5%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.7 pCi/L · 185 tests · 2.0 points above Oscoda County
15.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 2.0 pCi/L · 120 tests · 3.5 points below Oscoda County
14.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.6 pCi/L · 191 tests · 3.8 points below Oscoda County
13.3%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.9 pCi/L · 1,139 tests · 5.2 points below Oscoda County
12.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.0 pCi/L · 166 tests · 5.8 points below Oscoda County
7.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.7 pCi/L · 156 tests · 10.8 points below Oscoda County
6.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.3 pCi/L · 194 tests · 12.3 points below Oscoda County
Oscoda County, Residents
Oscoda County is growing: the Census Bureau puts it at 8,723 residents on July 1, 2025, up 6.0% from 8,230 in 2020. That works out to 15 people per square mile of land. Reported testing is thin here: 54 tests over 2008 to 2017, or 6.2 for every 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), where Michigan as a whole comes to 11.3.
Census lists no incorporated place in Oscoda County: every home in it reads the county's figures.
Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025).
Oscoda County, Homes
Oscoda County is a place of houses on their own lots: 81% of its 7,705 homes are detached single-family houses, against 72% across Michigan. Half of its homes were built before 1974, close to Michigan's 1972: 23% date from before 1960 and 12% from 2000 or later. Owners live in 87% of the occupied homes (Michigan: 73%), so for most households a test and a fix are their own to order.
| Homes | Oscoda County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 7,705 | 4,599,683 |
| Detached houses | 81% | 72% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 1% | 13% |
| Mobile homes | 16% | 5% |
| Built before 1960 | 23% | 36% |
| Built since 2000 | 12% | 15% |
| Middle year built | 1974 | 1972 |
| Owner-occupied | 87% | 73% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.