
Short-term kit![]()
Radon Short Term Test Kit short-term charcoal radon test kit, lab fee included
- Lab fee included
Method: Charcoal
In home: 2 to 7 days
Locations and reports
EPA puts Richmond County in Zone 3, its lowest radon zone, and only 1 radon test from it is on file with CDC (2021). Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
0.0%
22.6 pts below NC
52 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
0.6pCi/L
Below action level
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
52
68th of 75 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 3
Lower potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts under 2 pCi/L indoors
Rank in NC
70 of 75
Lowest quarter
By share, of 75 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Richmond County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 0.6 pCi/L
Below 2 pCi/L
This result is below 2 pCi/L, the level at which EPA says a fix should be considered. Richmond County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Richmond County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
USGS geologic potential: Low across 78% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
| Year | Share of reported tests at or above 4 pCi/L |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | 100.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0% |
2021: 0.0%. Across these years the share ran from 0.0% to 100.0%. Each column counts radon tests reported to CDC that year, not homes.
Only 1 test was reported to CDC for Richmond County over 2021, and tests are often run on homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: so few describe neither the county nor this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2021. Measured data period: 2005 to 2021 (every CDC figure on file).
Richmond County, Compared
Only 0 of 52 radon tests reported for Richmond County over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L (0.0%). The median result, 0.6 pCi/L, sits below 2, well under EPA's 4 pCi/L action level, and the top reported result was 2.5 pCi/L.
The newest figure, in 2021, counts only 1 test (0.0% at or above 4 pCi/L), too few to compare, so this reading uses the 52-test figure.
Across 99 North Carolina counties pooled together, 22.6% of tests reached that level, so Richmond County runs 22.6 points below its state. Against the national pool of 35.7%, the gap is 35.7 points lower. Its place in the state: 70th of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period.
Zone 3 on EPA's map (predicted average under 2 pCi/L) and a 0.0% share point the same way here. Of 4 neighbours with a figure, all 4 reported a larger share at or above 4 pCi/L; the spread is 3.2% (Scotland County) to 25.3% (Stanly County).
Below the action level, 51 tests (98.1%) came in under 2 pCi/L, against 55.6% statewide, and 1 tests (1.9%) fell between 2 and 4, against 21.8% statewide. USGS geology rates 78% of the county's land low radon potential.
The busiest year on file was 2014, with 4 tests reported; the quietest, 2021, had 1.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Richmond County, Geology
Most of the ground under Richmond County is one class on USGS's geologic map: 78.0% of its land is low radon potential, with 22.0% moderate. The map puts 65.1% of Richmond County in the area it calls Inner Coastal Plain and 22.0% in Carolina Slate Belt, with one smaller area beside them. USGS gives the first a radon index of 8, in the low band (5 to 8), and the second 9, in the moderate band (9 to 11).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Coastal Plain | Fossiliferous clay and sand, shelly sand, sandy marl, and limestone. | Low | 8 | 65.1% |
| Carolina Slate Belt | Felsic metavolcanics, intermediate volcanics, metamudstone, argillite, and epiclastic rocks. | Moderate | 9 | 22.0% |
| Wadesboro Subbasin | Arkosic sandstone, siltstone and conglomerate. | Low | 8 | 12.7% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Across North Carolina 1.3% of the land is rated high; none of Richmond County's is. Of the 8 counties that border it, 1 has more moderate-potential ground, Anson County the most at 31.1%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Richmond County, Local resources
The North Carolina Radon Program is presently developing a Radon Proficiency Program as directed by Session Law 2023-91 House Bill 782 .
What it means
Richmond County, Questions
In 2021, 0.0% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Richmond County, North Carolina were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 0.1 pCi/L. Of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 69 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 22.6%.
Richmond County borders 8 counties: Scotland County, NC, Anson County, NC, Moore County, NC, Montgomery County, NC, Hoke County, NC, Marlboro County, SC, Chesterfield County, SC and Stanly County, NC.
Products
Richmond County, Products
In Richmond County, 0.0% of 52 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 22.6% pooled across North Carolina. Zone 3 is the lowest label, yet homes at or above 4 pCi/L occur in every zone: a short-term kit (2 to 90 days) is the quick first check in Richmond County.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Explore
Richmond County, Bordering counties
25.3%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 2.2 pCi/L · 229 tests · 25.3 points above Richmond County
20.4%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.5 pCi/L · 103 tests · 20.4 points above Richmond County
19.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.3 pCi/L · 99 tests · 19.2 points above Richmond County
3.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.0 pCi/L · 31 tests · 3.2 points above Richmond County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.6 pCi/L · 18 tests · 0.0 points above Richmond County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.8 pCi/L · 19 tests · 0.0 points above Richmond County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.9 pCi/L · 7 tests · 0.0 points above Richmond County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.6 pCi/L · 10 tests · 0.0 points above Richmond County
Richmond County, Cities and towns
About 42,041 people live in Richmond County by the Census Bureau's estimate for July 1, 2025, 688 fewer than in 2020 (−1.6%). That works out to 89 people per square mile of land. Its largest town, Rockingham, has 8,815 residents, 21.0% of the total. Together its 6 incorporated places hold 39.8% of those residents; the other 60.2% live outside any of them. Reported testing is thin here: 52 tests over 2008 to 2017, or 1.2 for every 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), where North Carolina as a whole comes to 6.5.
From Rockingham to Norman, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Richmond County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockingham | 8,815 | −4.3% | 21.0% |
| Hamlet | 5,870 | −2.5% | 14.0% |
| Ellerbe | 845 | −1.2% | 2.0% |
| Dobbins Heights | 685 | −0.6% | 1.6% |
| Hoffman | 426 | +1.2% | 1.0% |
| Norman | 99 | −2.0% | 0.2% |
6 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025).
Richmond County, Homes
Of Richmond County's 19,840 homes, 69% are detached houses, against 65% across North Carolina; 19% are mobile homes. The homes are older than North Carolina's as a whole: half were built before 1975 (1990 for North Carolina), and 23% date from before 1960. 65% of occupied homes are lived in by their owner (North Carolina: 66%); in the rest a tenant can run a test, but a fix is the landlord's to make.
| Homes | Richmond County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 19,840 | 4,815,195 |
| Detached houses | 69% | 65% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 5% | 14% |
| Mobile homes | 19% | 11% |
| Built before 1960 | 23% | 14% |
| Built since 2000 | 16% | 33% |
| Middle year built | 1975 | 1990 |
| Owner-occupied | 65% | 66% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.