Skip to content

Locations and reports

Radon Levels in Jerauld County, South Dakota

EPA puts Jerauld County in Zone 1, its highest radon zone, and only 23 radon tests from it are on file with CDC (2008 to 2017, laboratory totals). Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.

Data checked By Radon411Methodology

  • Highest bordering

    63.0%

    Beadle County

    Beadle
    63.0%
    Brule
    62.5%

    2 of 6 neighbours have 30+ tests, 2006 to 2015

  • Nearest county

    63.0%

    Beadle County, 30 miles

    Beadle
    63.0%
    SD
    58.8%

    Share at 4+ pCi/L, 46 tests, 2006 to 2015

  • Ground above low

    100.0%

    1.0 pts above SD

    Jerauld
    100.0%
    SD
    99.0%

    Share of land USGS rates moderate or high potential

  • Tests reported

    24

    Too few for a share

    Jerauld
    24
    Needed
    30

    2007 to 2016, laboratory

  • EPA radon zone

    Zone 1

    Highest potential

    1. Zone 1
    2. 2
    3. 3

    1 highest, 3 lowest

    EPA predicts over 4 pCi/L indoors

Read a result for Jerauld County

Starts at EPA's action level

4.0pCi/L

EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.

EPA’s reading of 4.0 pCi/L

At or above 4 pCi/L

  1. Under 20 to 1.9 pCi/L
  2. 2 to 4consider a fix
  3. 4 and aboveEPA says fix it

This result is at or above 4 pCi/L. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher.

The data

Jerauld County, At a glance

Jerauld County at a glance

Predicted: EPA radon zone

EPA Zone 1: highest predicted potential

EPA puts all of Jerauld County in and predicts an average indoor of greater than 4 pCi/L (greater than 150 Bq/m³) across the county. That is one forecast for the whole county, not a reading of any address in it; homes above EPA's turn up in all three zones.

USGS geologic potential: High across 100% of the county's area

Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones

Measured: tests reported to CDC

Radon tests reported for Jerauld County, 2008 to 2017, laboratory

CDC holds 23 reported tests for Jerauld County over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, with a median of 8.8 pCi/L: too few to describe a county (Radon411 reads a share from 30 tests up). Jerauld County beside the counties around it is how this page reads it.

What these figures count

Only 23 tests were reported to CDC for Jerauld County over 2008 to 2017 (laboratory totals), and tests are often run on homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: so few describe neither the county nor this house.

Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2008 to 2017, laboratory. Measured data period: 2005 to 2017 (every CDC figure on file).

How to read these figures

Jerauld County, Compared

Jerauld County radon figures, compared

Calculated by Radon411

CDC's largest figure for Jerauld County rests on 24 tests over the 2007 to 2016 laboratory totals, 17 of them at or above 4 pCi/L, so each test moves its share by 4.2 points and no rank or comparison is drawn from it. Results reached as high as 35.0 pCi/L, with a middle value of 8.2 pCi/L.

Of the counties bordering it, 2 have a figure over the 2006 to 2015 laboratory totals: Beadle County reported the largest share at or above 4 pCi/L, 63.0%, and Brule County the smallest, 62.5%. Farther out, Davison County (36 miles away) at 47.9%, Kingsbury County (60 miles away) at 68.8% and Hughes County (71 miles away) at 66.7% have figures too. Pooled across 63 South Dakota counties, 58.8% of reported tests reached that level; across every county in the country with a figure, 36.3%.

Statewide for the same period, Bon Homme County reported the highest share (79.5%) and Davison County the lowest (47.9%). EPA's 1993 map puts Jerauld County in Zone 1, the map's highest label: a predicted county average above 4 pCi/L. USGS geology rates 100% of the county's land high radon potential.

South Dakota, the United States and the counties around Jerauld County, 2006 to 2015, laboratory
AreaTestsAt or above 4 pCi/LMedian
South Dakota, pooled63 counties, pooled4,89358.8%Not pooled
United States, pooled2,669 counties, pooled1,805,52836.3%Not pooled
Bon Homme Countyhighest in the state3979.5%8.1 pCi/L
Davison Countylowest in the state7147.9%3.7 pCi/L
Buffalo County, SDborders it1100.0%10.9 pCi/L
Hand County, SDborders it1080.0%4.8 pCi/L
Sanborn County, SDborders it366.7%5.8 pCi/L
Beadle County, SDborders it4663.0%5.6 pCi/L
Brule County, SDborders it3262.5%6.3 pCi/L
Aurora County, SDborders it1040.0%2.3 pCi/L
The nearest South Dakota counties to Jerauld County with 30 or more tests, 2006 to 2015, laboratory
CountyDistanceTestsAt or above 4 pCi/LMedian
Beadle County30 mi4663.0%5.6 pCi/L
Brule County33 mi3262.5%6.3 pCi/L
Davison County36 mi7147.9%3.7 pCi/L
Kingsbury County60 mi3268.8%8.4 pCi/L
Hughes County71 mi3066.7%5.5 pCi/L
Lake County75 mi3873.7%8.3 pCi/L
Bon Homme County83 mi3979.5%8.1 pCi/L
Turner County91 mi4553.3%4.0 pCi/L
Jerauld County ten-year laboratory totals, against South Dakota's pooled share
PeriodTestsAt or above 4 pCi/LMedianHighestSouth Dakota, pooledChange from the row before
2008 to 20172369.6%8.8 pCi/L35.0 pCi/L58.5%−1.2 points
2007 to 20162470.8%8.2 pCi/L35.0 pCi/L57.4%−1.9 points
2006 to 20152272.7%8.2 pCi/L35.0 pCi/L58.8%−3.5 points
2005 to 20142176.2%8.8 pCi/L35.0 pCi/L59.6%First on file

Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.

Jerauld County, Geology

The ground under Jerauld County

Predicted

USGS's geologic map puts all of Jerauld County's mapped land in one class: high radon potential. All of it lies in the area the map calls Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des Prairies, to which USGS gives a radon index of 14, in the high band (12 to 17).

USGS's geologic areas under Jerauld County
AreaThe rock, in USGS's wordsPotentialRadon indexShare of land
Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des PrairiesGlacial drift derived largely from Cretaceous marine shale.High14100%

Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.

Jerauld County beside the ground around it

Jerauld County has more high-potential ground than South Dakota as a whole: 100% of its land against 56.7%. Of the 6 counties that border it, none has as large a share of high-potential ground; Aurora County comes nearest at 100%.

Share of land by USGS radon potential: Jerauld County, the 6 counties bordering it and South Dakota
AreaEPA zoneLow potentialModerate potentialHigh potential
Jerauld CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Aurora CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Sanborn CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Beadle CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Hand CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Buffalo CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
Brule CountyZone 1NoneNone100%
South Dakota66 counties, pooled by land areaVaries1.0%42.3%56.7%

The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.

What it means

Jerauld County, Questions

Questions about radon in Jerauld County

Are radon levels high in Jerauld County?

Over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, 69.6% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Jerauld County, South Dakota were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 8.8 pCi/L. Of the counties bordering it, 2 have a figure over the 2006 to 2015 laboratory totals: Beadle County reported the largest share at or above 4 pCi/L, 63.0%, and Brule County the smallest, 62.5%.

Which counties border Jerauld County?

Jerauld County borders 6 counties: Aurora County, Sanborn County, Beadle County, Hand County, Buffalo County and Brule County.

Products

Jerauld County, Products

Testing a home in Jerauld County

No CDC figure names Jerauld County; the nearest county with one, Beadle County (30 miles away), reported 63.0% of its tests at or above 4 pCi/L over the 2006 to 2015 laboratory totals, the only reading nearby until a test of this home. In Zone 1 the year-round level in Jerauld County is the one to know: a long-term test (more than 90 days) or a monitor, with a short-term kit for a first answer.

Test kits and monitors3

See every kit and monitor

Jerauld County is in EPA Zone 1, the highest predicted radon potential. Best radon monitors for Zone 1 counties like Jerauld County

Explore

Jerauld County, Bordering counties

Counties bordering Jerauld County

Calculated by Radon411

Jerauld County, Cities and towns

Cities and towns in Jerauld County

The Census Bureau estimates 1,654 residents in Jerauld County for July 1, 2025, 10 more than in 2020 (+0.6%). Spread over its land, that is 3.1 people to the square mile. Its largest town, Wessington Springs, has 753 residents, 45.5% of the total. Together its 3 incorporated places hold 61.7% of those residents; the other 38.3% live outside any of them. Testing is reported here more often than across the state: CDC's 24 reported tests for 2007 to 2016 come to 14.5 for every 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), against 5.7 for South Dakota.

From Wessington Springs to Lane, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Jerauld County's.

The cities and towns in Jerauld County by residents, July 1, 2025
PlaceResidentsSince 2020Share of residents
Wessington Springs753−1.4%45.5%
Alpena215+2.9%13.0%
Lane52+4.0%3.1%

3 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025).

Jerauld County, Homes

Homes in Jerauld County

Jerauld County is a place of houses on their own lots: 86% of its 1,001 homes are detached single-family houses, against 67% across South Dakota. The homes are older than South Dakota's as a whole: half were built before 1955 (1979 for South Dakota), and 54% date from before 1960. Owners live in 85% of the occupied homes (South Dakota: 69%), so for most households a test and a fix are their own to order.

Homes in Jerauld County, South Dakota, 2019 to 2023
HomesJerauld CountySouth Dakota
Housing units1,001402,364
Detached houses86%67%
In buildings of 5 or more7%16%
Mobile homes7%8%
Built before 196054%29%
Built since 200014%28%
Middle year built19551979
Owner-occupied85%69%

Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.