Radon gas
What it is, where it comes from and how it gets indoors.
Read the guideCounty radon reportThe RADON411 Location Report
Your county's EPA zone, the tests reported there and how to test this week, in one dated PDF.
Short answer
Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States after smoking, and EPA estimates it is responsible for about 21,000 lung cancer deaths a year, about 2,900 among people who have never smoked. The risk rises with the level and years of exposure, is far higher for smokers, and falls when the level drops.
Next step: a test is the only way to know your home's level. How to test your home
Radon lung cancer risk is the reason EPA, CDC, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and WHO publish guidance on radon at all. The agencies agree on the core facts: radon causes lung cancer, the risk grows with the concentration and the years of exposure, smoking multiplies it, and lowering the level in a home reduces it. This guide sets out how radon damages the lungs, how the link was established, what the risk charts say at each level, and how radon compares with smoking.
| Group | Radon-related deaths |
|---|---|
| All lung cancer deaths (157,400) | 21,100 (13.4%) |
| Ever smokers | 18,200 |
| Never smokers | 2,900 |
“Indoor radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer in the United States and breathing it over prolonged periods can present a significant health risk to families all over the country. It’s important to know that this threat is completely preventable. Radon can be detected with a simple test and fixed through well-established venting techniques.”
That warning comes from the national health advisory U.S. Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona issued in January 2005, which EPA reprints in its Citizen's Guide. The advisory's own text is blunt: more than 20,000 Americans die of radon-related lung cancer every year, and if you also smoke, your risk of lung cancer is much higher. It told Americans to test their homes and, at a level of 4 or more, to take steps to remedy the problem as soon as possible.
EPA's Home Buyer's and Seller's Guide gives the short version: you cannot see, smell or taste radon, and when you breathe air containing radon, you increase your risk of getting lung cancer. EPA's Citizen's Guide calls it a cancer-causing, radioactive gas. The danger is not a sudden illness but a long-term rise in the chance of one disease.
WHO describes radon as one of the leading causes of lung cancer and a major cause of lung cancer. EPA's Health Risk of Radon page lists smoking, radon and secondhand smoke as the leading causes of lung cancer, with smoking first, radon second, and secondhand smoke third at an estimated 3,000 lung cancer deaths every year. Radon accumulates indoors because, as EPA explains, the home traps it inside, where it can build up; outdoors, WHO notes, it quickly dilutes to very low concentrations. NCI adds that in areas without adequate ventilation, such as underground mines, radon can accumulate to levels that substantially increase the risk of lung cancer.
Radon decays in indoor air
WHO: radon escapes from the ground into the air, where it decays and produces further radioactive particles. NCI: radon decays quickly, giving off tiny radioactive particles.
The particles are breathed in
WHO: as we breathe, these particles are deposited on the cells lining the airways. CDC: radioactive particles from the decay of radon gas can get trapped in your lungs.
They release energy
EPA: as the particles break down further, they release small bursts of energy. ATSDR: some of the decays expel high-energy alpha particles, which are the main source of health concerns.
Cells are damaged
EPA: this can damage lung tissue. WHO: the particles can damage DNA and potentially cause lung cancer. NCI: when inhaled, these radioactive particles can damage the cells that line the lung.
Disease may follow years later
EPA: this can lead to lung cancer over the course of your lifetime. Not everyone exposed to elevated levels of radon will develop lung cancer, and the time between exposure and the onset of the disease may be many years.
Alpha radiation. ATSDR explains that when radon or its progeny decay, some of the decays expel high-energy alpha particles, and that the main isotope of health concern is radon-222. In ATSDR's words, many scientists believe that the alpha radiation dose from long-term exposure to elevated levels of radon progeny in air increases your chance of getting lung cancer. The radon element guide covers the decay chain itself.
The evidence began with miners. NCI says radon was identified as a health problem when scientists noted that underground uranium miners who were exposed to it died of lung cancer at high rates, and WHO says an increased rate of lung cancer was first seen in uranium miners exposed to very high concentrations of radon. NCI adds that the results of miner studies have been confirmed by experimental animal studies, which show higher rates of lung tumors among rodents exposed to high radon levels.
| Evidence | What it found |
|---|---|
| Underground uranium miners | Miners exposed to radon died of lung cancer at high rates. |
| BEIR IV (National Academy of Sciences, 1988) | A risk model derived from epidemiologic results on 4 cohorts of occupationally exposed underground miners. |
| BEIR VI (National Academy of Sciences, 1999) | New risk models from 11 miner cohorts, about 2,700 lung cancers among 68,000 miners. Its major conclusion: radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking. |
| Animal studies | Higher rates of lung tumors among rodents exposed to high radon levels. |
| Home (case-control) studies | A meta-analysis of eight published case-control studies showed an enhanced risk for lung cancer associated with elevated radon exposure, very close to what the miner data predict. |
| Pooled North American and European studies (2005) | Definitive evidence of an association between residential radon exposure and lung cancer, confirming the risks predicted by the miner studies. |
The question was whether miners' results applied to ordinary homes, where levels are far lower. In the home studies NCI describes, scientists compare radon levels in the homes of people who have lung cancer with those of people who have not. Researchers have combined and analyzed data from all radon studies conducted in Canada and the United States; the results demonstrated a slightly increased risk of lung cancer for individuals with elevated exposure to household radon, and that increased risk was consistent with the estimated level of risk based on studies of underground miners. WHO adds that studies in Europe, North America and China have confirmed that even low concentrations of radon, such as those commonly found in homes, pose health risks. On the 2005 pooled studies, EPA quotes the former director of its Indoor Environments Division, Tom Kelly:
“We know that radon is a carcinogen. This research confirms that breathing low levels of radon can lead to lung cancer.”
ATSDR states that the Department of Health and Human Services, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and EPA all consider radon to be a human carcinogen. IARC's list of classifications by cancer site places radon-222 and its decay products among the carcinogenic agents with sufficient evidence in humans for the lung. EPA's 2003 assessment opens by noting that radon has been classified as a known human carcinogen. NCI sums up where the science stands: scientists agree that radon causes lung cancer in humans.
Each figure is given as published. The estimates differ because they come from different models and years; none is a count of death certificates.
| Figure | What it describes |
|---|---|
| About 21,000 a year | EPA's best estimate of radon-related lung cancer deaths in the U.S., with an uncertainty range of 8,000 to 45,000 |
| 21,100 of 157,400 (13.4%) | Radon-related share of all U.S. lung cancer deaths in 1995, split 13,000 males and 8,100 females, 18,200 ever smokers and 2,900 never smokers |
| 15,000 to 22,000 a year | NCI's range of U.S. lung cancer deaths related to radon |
| More than 10 percent | Share of radon-related cancer deaths that NCI says occur among nonsmokers |
| 3% to 14% | WHO's estimate of the share of all lung cancers in a country caused by radon, depending on the national average radon level and smoking prevalence |
| About 16% per 100 Bq/m3 | The increase in lung cancer risk per 100 Bq/m3 increase in long-term average radon concentration |
EPA's figure rests on the National Academy of Sciences' BEIR VI report of 1999, which EPA calls the most definitive accumulation of scientific data on indoor radon and which confirmed radon as the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S. In 2003 EPA updated its risk estimates from that report, working with its Science Advisory Board, and arrived at a best estimate of about 21,000 annual lung cancer deaths from radon, with an uncertainty range of 8,000 to 45,000. CDC cites the EPA and Surgeon General estimate as more than 21,000 lung cancer deaths each year.
WHO's estimate that radon causes 3% to 14% of all lung cancers in a country explains why the share differs from place to place: it depends on the national average radon level and on how common smoking is. WHO also describes how risk scales with concentration. Under the model WHO describes, the risk falls in proportion as the concentration falls, so a lower level carries a lower risk rather than none.
“The dose-response relation is assumed to be linear - i.e. the risk of lung cancer increases proportionally with increasing radon exposure.”
EPA publishes a chart that turns its risk model into lifetime numbers at different radon levels, separately for people who have never smoked and people who smoke. Each row is EPA's estimate for 1,000 people exposed to that level over a lifetime, from its 2003 Assessment of Risks from Radon in Homes.
| Radon level | Bq/m3, as EPA prints it | 1,000 people who never smoked, exposed over a lifetime | 1,000 people who smoked, exposed over a lifetime | EPA's guidance at this level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 pCi/L | 740 | About 36 could get lung cancer | About 260 could get lung cancer | Fix your home |
| 10 pCi/L | 370 | About 18 | About 150 | Fix your home |
| 8 pCi/L | 300 | About 15 | About 120 | Fix your home |
| 4 pCi/L | 150 | About 7 | About 62 | Fix your home |
| 2 pCi/L | 75 | About 4 | About 32 | Consider fixing between 2 and 4 pCi/L |
| 1.3 pCi/L (average indoor level) | 50 | About 2 | About 20 | None listed; EPA notes reducing radon below 2 pCi/L is difficult |
| 0.4 pCi/L (average outdoor level) | 15 | Not given | About 3 | None listed |
Appendix D of EPA's 2003 assessment prints the underlying lifetime risks as percentages, and adds a column for the general population. It assumes constant lifetime exposure in homes at each level.
| Radon level (pCi/L) | Never smokers | Current smokers | General population |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 3.6% | 26.3% | 10.5% |
| 10 | 1.8% | 15.0% | 5.6% |
| 8 | 1.5% | 12.0% | 4.5% |
| 4 | 0.7% | 6.2% | 2.3% |
| 2 | 0.4% | 3.2% | 1.2% |
| 1.25 | 0.2% | 2.0% | 0.7% |
| 0.4 | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.2% |

The chart also shows why EPA says radon levels below 4 pCi/L still pose a risk: the rows under the do not fall to zero. EPA's guidance follows from that. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher. EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. To place your own result on the scale, use the result interpreter or read what radon levels mean.
EPA's chart sets each radon level beside a familiar risk.
| Radon level | People who smoked: EPA's comparison | People who never smoked: EPA's comparison |
|---|---|---|
| 20 pCi/L | 250 times the risk of drowning | 35 times the risk of drowning |
| 10 pCi/L | 200 times the risk of dying in a home fire | 20 times the risk of dying in a home fire |
| 8 pCi/L | 30 times the risk of dying in a fall | 4 times the risk of dying in a fall |
| 4 pCi/L | 5 times the risk of dying in a car crash | The risk of dying in a car crash |
| 2 pCi/L | 6 times the risk of dying from poison | The risk of dying from poison |
EPA's Health Risk of Radon page adds why lung cancer weighs so heavily: from the time of diagnosis, between 11 and 15 percent of those afflicted will live beyond five years. NCI puts radon in proportion: cigarette smoking is the most common cause of lung cancer, and radon represents a far smaller risk for this disease, but it is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States.
Smoking is the leading cause of lung cancer, EPA says, and radon the second. CDC is specific: cigarette smoking is the number one risk factor for lung cancer, it is linked to about 80% of lung cancer deaths in the United States, and people who smoke cigarettes are 15 to 30 times more likely to get lung cancer or die from it than people who do not smoke. Among people who do not smoke, radon moves to first place: EPA estimates it is the number one cause of lung cancer among non-smokers. CDC adds that radon can cause lung cancer in people who have never smoked cigarettes.
The two exposures are not simply added together. EPA's 2003 assessment concluded that the effects of radon and cigarette smoking are synergistic, so that smokers are at higher risk from radon. NCI puts it the same way: exposure to the combination of radon gas and cigarette smoke creates a greater risk of lung cancer than exposure to either factor alone.
| Measure | Ever or current smokers | Never smokers |
|---|---|---|
| Radon-related U.S. lung cancer deaths, 1995 | 18,200 | 2,900 |
| Share of the group's lung cancer deaths due to radon | About 1 in 8 | About 1 in 4 |
| Lifetime risk at 4 pCi/L | 4.1% (ever smokers) | 0.73% |
| Out of 1,000 people exposed at 4 pCi/L over a lifetime | About 62 could get lung cancer | About 7 |
| At the average indoor level, 1.3 pCi/L | A 20 in 1,000 chance of dying from lung cancer | A 2 in 1,000 chance of lung cancer |
WHO estimates smokers are 25 times more at risk from radon than non-smokers; CDC says people who smoke have a 10 times greater risk of lung cancer from the same radon levels. EPA's 2003 assessment adds a subtlety: the excess relative risk is about twice as high for never smokers, but since ever smokers have a much higher baseline lung cancer rate, their absolute risk from radon is still much higher. So never smokers owe a larger share of their lung cancers to radon, while smokers account for most of the deaths.
There is no known threshold, a number of years after which radon causes cancer. The risk builds with the level and the time spent breathing it. EPA says your chances of getting lung cancer from radon depend mostly on how much radon is in your home, the amount of time you spend in your home, and whether you are a smoker or have ever smoked. CDC says it takes many years for lung cancer to develop, and that most people don't have symptoms until lung cancer is advanced, when it is harder to treat.
| Question | Detail |
|---|---|
| How is exposure counted? | EPA's risk chart assumes constant lifetime exposure in homes at each level. |
| Is there a delay before risk appears? | Both preferred BEIR VI models incorporate a 5-year minimum latency period. |
| At what age do radon lung cancer deaths occur? | About 65 on average, compared with 72 for all lung cancer deaths. |
| How many years of life are lost? | About 17 years per radon-related death, compared with 12 for lung cancer deaths generally. |
| How long before health problems appear? | It may take years before health problems appear. |
Years, and often decades. EPA's Citizen's Guide says the amount of time between exposure and the onset of the disease may be many years. The 5-year figure above is a modelling assumption about the shortest delay, not a prediction that cancer follows after five years. EPA's risk figures are lifetime estimates, which is why testing and lowering a high level sooner means fewer years at that level.
People ask whether radon causes other cancers. NCI's answer is that lung cancer is the only cancer proven to be associated with inhaling radon, and WHO's is that no other cancer risks or other health effects have been established to date, although inhaled radon can deliver radiation to other organs, at a much lower level than to the lungs. The table sets out what is established for each, including the questions that remain open.
| Condition | Detail |
|---|---|
| Lung cancer | Established. The only cancer proven to be associated with inhaling radon. |
| Leukemia | There has been a suggestion of increased risk of leukemia in adults and children; however, the evidence is not conclusive. |
| Stomach cancer from drinking water | Epidemiological studies have not confirmed an association between drinking water containing radon and an increased risk of stomach cancer. |
| Thyroid, breast, brain and other cancers | Not linked to radon. No other cancer risks have been established to date. |
| Stroke | Research published in 2024 found higher indoor radon associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in middle-age to older women; NIEHS says future studies can further examine it. |
| COPD | An NIEHS-funded project found radon decay particles associated with reduced pulmonary function in COPD patients. |
Radon in water raises a separate question about the stomach. EPA says your risk of lung cancer from breathing radon in air is much larger than your risk of stomach cancer from swallowing water with radon in it, and that most of the risk from radon in water comes from radon released into the air. See radon in water. The stroke and COPD findings are research associations that NIEHS reports, not established effects.
WHO says that for most people the greatest exposure to radon occurs in the home, where people spend much of their time, though indoor workplaces can also be a source. CDC lists what raises the risk of lung cancer from radon: high levels in your home or another building you regularly spend time in, high levels in the part of the building where you spend the most time (often basements and lower levels), smoking now or in the past, and burning substances that add particles to the air.
| Group | Detail |
|---|---|
| People who smoke | Cigarette smoking greatly increases your chance of developing lung cancer if you are exposed to radon at the same levels as people who do not smoke. |
| Former smokers | Risk may be lower than the smokers' column of EPA's chart and higher than the never-smokers' column. |
| People who never smoked | Radon is the number one cause of lung cancer among non-smokers, by EPA's estimates. |
| Children | Smaller lungs and faster breathing rates may result in higher radiation doses to children's lungs, but limited information from children employed as miners in China does not provide evidence of increased susceptibility. |
| Miners | Uranium miners generally are believed to have the highest exposures. |
On children, CDC says there is not enough data to show whether they have a higher risk of lung cancer from radon than adults, and EPA's Citizen's Guide says there are currently no conclusive data either way. ATSDR puts the general rule plainly: the greater your exposure to radon, especially if you smoke cigarettes, the greater your chance of developing lung cancer.
| Belief | Detail |
|---|---|
| Only smokers get lung cancer from radon. | Radon can cause lung cancer in people who have never smoked cigarettes; EPA estimates 2,900 never-smoker deaths a year. |
| A level below 4 pCi/L carries no risk. | Radon levels less than 4 pCi/L still pose a health risk and can be reduced in many cases. |
| Radon would cause symptoms first. | The Surgeon General's advisory describes radon as a gas with no immediate health symptoms. |
| A doctor can test my body for radon exposure. | Radon in human tissues is not detectable by routine medical testing, and tests for its progeny cannot tell how much radon you were exposed to. Exposure is estimated by measuring radon in the air. |
| The risk estimates come only from miners. | Pooled home studies in North America and Europe confirmed the risks predicted by the miner studies. |
For the wider debate about whether radon risk is overstated, including the county-level study that some cite against it, see is radon a scam?.
EPA's Citizen's Guide states the principle: since there is no known safe level of radon, there can always be some risk, but the risk can be reduced by lowering the radon level in your home. CDC puts it more directly still: reducing radon inside your home or building will always help reduce your risk of lung cancer, even when the level in your home is less than 4 pCi/L. And EPA says it is never too late to reduce your risk of lung cancer.
Test
Testing is the only way to know the radon level in a specific building. Test the lowest lived-in level with a short-term test of at least 48 hours under closed-house conditions, or a long-term test of more than 90 days. See how to test for radon.
Confirm a high result
EPA recommends following a first short-term result at or above the action level with a long-term test, or a second short-term test if you need results quickly.
Fix
EPA says the method primarily used is a vent pipe system and fan that pulls radon from beneath the house and vents it outside, and that some systems reduce radon levels by up to 99%. Use a contractor trained to fix radon problems; the directory lists mitigation professionals.
Retest
Test again after the work to be sure radon levels have been reduced, and retest every two years to be sure they remain low.
EPA's 2003 assessment explains why fixing the highest homes matters most but is not the whole story: it is not feasible to totally eliminate radon from the air, and it cites an estimate that about one-fourth of the radon-related lung cancers could be averted by reducing radon in homes that exceed the 4 pCi/L action level. WHO notes that well-tested, durable and cost-efficient methods exist for preventing radon entry into new buildings and reducing radon in existing ones. For what a fix involves, see radon mitigation; for area data as context before you test, see the radon map.
Yes, lung cancer. EPA calls radon a cancer-causing, radioactive gas and the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking.
Lung cancer only. NCI calls it the only cancer proven to be associated with inhaling radon, and WHO states that no other cancer risks or other health effects have been established to date.
This guide names no cell type for radon lung cancer. What is agreed is the mechanism: radon's decay particles lodge in the airways and their alpha radiation can damage the cells that line the lung.
A higher risk of lung cancer after long exposure. EPA notes that not everyone exposed to elevated levels will develop lung cancer, and that the disease may appear many years after exposure.
Radon's decay particles are deposited in the airways, where WHO says they can damage DNA, and EPA says they release small bursts of energy that can damage lung tissue.
The Surgeon General's advisory describes radon as a gas with no immediate health symptoms, and a cough or headaches are not known signs of exposure. See radon symptoms.
Radon is not linked to those cancers. WHO says no cancer risks other than lung cancer have been established to date.
NCI says there has been a suggestion of increased risk of leukemia associated with radon exposure in adults and children, but the evidence is not conclusive.
There is no known threshold. EPA's risk estimates are for lifetime exposure, CDC says lung cancer takes many years to develop, and EPA says your chances depend mostly on the level, the time spent in the home, and smoking.
About 21,000, with an uncertainty range of 8,000 to 45,000. About 2,900 of those deaths occur among people who have never smoked.
No level is risk free: CDC says there is no known safe level of radon, and EPA's chart shows risk at every level, rising with the concentration. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher. EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L.
EPA says radon levels below 4 pCi/L still pose some risk, and WHO says studies have confirmed that even low concentrations such as those in homes pose health risks.
EPA estimates about 21,000 lung cancer deaths a year from radon. The risk is a long-term one, not a sudden poisoning.
That is a question for a doctor. Bring your test results, how long you lived with them, and your smoking history.
EPA says stopping smoking and lowering the radon level in your house will reduce your lung cancer risk, and CDC says quitting is still the best way to reduce your risk of lung cancer.
CDC says there is not enough data to show it, though children may receive higher doses at the same level. ATSDR reports that limited information from children employed as miners in China does not show increased susceptibility.
Yes. It rests on studies of underground miners, animal studies, and residential studies in North America, Europe and China, summarized by EPA, NCI, the National Academy of Sciences' BEIR VI report and WHO.
What radon is, where it comes from, how it gets indoors and what it does to health.
What it is, where it comes from and how it gets indoors.
Read the guideHow it gets in, where it builds up and what to do about it.
Read the guide5 facts about radon, the key statistics and the truth behind the myths.
Read the guide