
Short-term kitKidde
442020 short-term charcoal radon test kit
- Lab fee included
Method: Charcoal
In home: 3 days
Locations and reports
EPA puts Jackson County in Zone 2, its middle radon zone, and only 9 radon tests from it are on file with CDC (2022). Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
27.7%
5.1 pts above NC
1,026 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
2.2pCi/L
Below action level
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
1,026
17th of 75 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 2
Moderate potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts 2 to 4 pCi/L indoors
Rank in NC
28 of 75
Middle half
By share, of 75 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Jackson County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 2.2 pCi/L
Between 2 and 4 pCi/L
This result is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. Jackson County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Jackson County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
Jackson County is a
USGS geologic potential: Moderate across 100% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
| Year | Share of reported tests at or above 4 pCi/L |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 18.9% |
| 2020 | 26.7% |
| 2021 | 21.1% |
| 2022 | 33.3% |
2022: 33.3%. Across these years the share ran from 18.9% to 33.3%. Each column counts radon tests reported to CDC that year, not homes.
Only 9 tests were reported to CDC for Jackson County over 2022, and tests are often run on homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: so few describe neither the county nor this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2022. Measured data period: 2005 to 2022 (every CDC figure on file).
Jackson County, Compared
Jackson County's 1,026 reported tests over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals had a middle value of 2.2 pCi/L and a maximum of 57.4 pCi/L, and 27.7% reached 4 pCi/L. North Carolina as a whole (99 North Carolina counties, pooled) comes to 22.6%: 5.1 points lower than here.
The newest figure, in 2022, counts only 9 tests (33.3% at or above 4 pCi/L), too few to compare, so this reading uses the 1,026-test figure.
Among its state's counties it ranks 28th of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period. Statewide for the same period, Transylvania County reported the highest share (47.8%) and Nash County the lowest (0.0%).
Below the action level, 469 tests (45.7%) came in under 2 pCi/L, against 55.6% statewide, and 273 tests (26.6%) fell between 2 and 4, against 21.8% statewide. The busiest year on file was 2020, with 352 tests reported; the quietest, 2022, had 9.
EPA's 1993 zone map puts Jackson County in Zone 2, a predicted county average between 2 and 4 pCi/L. USGS geology rates 100% of the county's land moderate radon potential.
Next door, the shares run from 17.1% in Macon County to 47.8% in Transylvania County, with Rabun County, GA and Macon County below Jackson County. Over 3 years of annual figures the share rose 2.2 points, from 18.9% in 2014 to 21.1% in 2021; its peak was 26.7% in 2020.
CDC also counts 46 tests taken after mitigation in Jackson County for the same period: tests in homes where a fix was already in.
| Year | Tests | Jackson County, at or above 4 pCi/L | North Carolina, pooled |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 233 | 18.9% | 21.9% |
| 2020 | 352 | 26.7% | 21.1% |
| 2021 | 237 | 21.1% | 14.9% |
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Jackson County, Geology
USGS's geologic map puts all of Jackson County's mapped land in one class: moderate radon potential. The map puts 61.1% of Jackson County in the area it calls Georgiabama Thrust Stack (South) and 38.9% in Blue Ridge. USGS gives the first a radon index of 9 and the second 10, both in the moderate band (9 to 11).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Georgiabama Thrust Stack (South) | Schist, amphibolite and granite. | Moderate | 9 | 61.1% |
| Blue Ridge | Granite, pegmatite, monazite, schist, and gneiss. | Moderate | 10 | 38.9% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Across North Carolina 1.3% of the land is rated high; none of Jackson County's is. Of the 6 counties that border it, 2 have more high-potential ground, Transylvania County the most at 52.0%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Jackson County, Local resources
The North Carolina Radon Program is presently developing a Radon Proficiency Program as directed by Session Law 2023-91 House Bill 782 .
What it means
Jackson County, Questions
In 2022, 33.3% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Jackson County, North Carolina were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 2.0 pCi/L. Of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 27 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 22.6%.
Jackson County borders 6 counties: Transylvania County, NC, Macon County, NC, Haywood County, NC, Swain County, NC, Oconee County, SC and Rabun County, GA.
Products
Jackson County, Products
In Jackson County, 27.7% of 1,026 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 22.6% pooled across North Carolina. In Zone 2 a short-term kit (2 to 90 days) is the quick first check in Jackson County; a long-term test tells the year-round average.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Explore
Jackson County, Bordering counties
47.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 3.7 pCi/L · 3,862 tests · 20.1 points above Jackson County
44.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 3.4 pCi/L · 116 tests · 16.3 points above Jackson County
42.6%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 3.3 pCi/L · 2,469 tests · 14.9 points above Jackson County
30.6%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 2.2 pCi/L · 1,872 tests · 2.9 points above Jackson County
26.1%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 2.0 pCi/L · 69 tests · 1.6 points below Jackson County
17.1%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.4 pCi/L · 1,354 tests · 10.6 points below Jackson County
Jackson County, Cities and towns
Jackson County is growing: the Census Bureau puts it at 45,039 residents on July 1, 2025, up 6.9% from 42,142 in 2020. That works out to 92 people per square mile of land. No town dominates: Sylva, the largest, has 2,691 residents, 6.0% of the total. Testing is reported here more often than across the state: CDC's 1,026 reported tests for 2008 to 2017 come to 22.8 for every 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), against 6.5 for North Carolina.
From Sylva to Dillsboro, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Jackson County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sylva | 2,691 | +4.3% | 6.0% |
| Highlandsextends beyond Jackson County | 1,127 | +5.4% | Counted whole |
| Webster | 387 | +3.8% | 0.9% |
| Forest Hills | 325 | +4.5% | 0.7% |
| Dillsboro | 217 | +4.3% | 0.5% |
5 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025). A place that extends beyond Jackson County is counted whole, so it has no share.
Jackson County, Homes
Of Jackson County's 27,385 homes, 70% are detached houses, against 65% across North Carolina; 17% are mobile homes. Half of its homes were built before 1990, close to North Carolina's 1990: 12% date from before 1960 and 33% from 2000 or later. 63% of occupied homes are lived in by their owner (North Carolina: 66%); in the rest a tenant can run a test, but a fix is the landlord's to make.
| Homes | Jackson County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 27,385 | 4,815,195 |
| Detached houses | 70% | 65% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 8% | 14% |
| Mobile homes | 17% | 11% |
| Built before 1960 | 12% | 14% |
| Built since 2000 | 33% | 33% |
| Middle year built | 1990 | 1990 |
| Owner-occupied | 63% | 66% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.