
Long-term kit![]()
RL116 long-term radon test kit
- Lab fee extra
Method: Alpha track
In home: 90 days to 12 months
Locations and reports
EPA puts Yankton County in Zone 1, its highest radon zone, and high results are common there: 72.9% of the 118 radon tests reported to CDC (2008 to 2017, laboratory totals) came back at or above 4 pCi/L. Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
72.9%
14.4 pts above SD
118 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
6.3pCi/L
Action level reached
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
118
8th of 23 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 1
Highest potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts over 4 pCi/L indoors
Rank in SD
3 of 23
Top quarter
By share, of 23 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Yankton County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 6.3 pCi/L
At or above 4 pCi/L
This result is at or above 4 pCi/L. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher. Yankton County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Yankton County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
EPA puts all of Yankton County in
USGS geologic potential: High across 100% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
Of 118 pre-mitigation tests reported to CDC, not homes in this area.
| Result band | Tests Measured | Share Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 pCi/L | 21 | 17.8% |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 11 | 9.3% |
| 4 pCi/L and above | 86 | 72.9% |
These are the 118 tests reported to CDC for Yankton County over 2008 to 2017 (laboratory totals), many from homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: they describe the county's reported tests, not this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2008 to 2017, laboratory. Measured data period: 2005 to 2017 (every CDC figure on file).
Yankton County, Compared
More than half: 72.9% of the 118 radon tests reported to CDC for Yankton County over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals read at least 4 pCi/L. That places it 3rd of 23 South Dakota counties with 30 or more tests for the same period. That is 14.4 points above the 58.5% pooled from 62 South Dakota counties.
The median result, 6.3 pCi/L, sits above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level, and the top reported result was 73.4 pCi/L. The rest split 17.8% under 2 pCi/L and 9.3% from 2 to 4 (South Dakota: 23.6% and 17.9%). Zone 1 on EPA's map (predicted average above 4 pCi/L) and a 72.9% share point the same way here.
2 of its 6 bordering counties with figures ran higher, led by Cedar County, NE at 76.8%; Clay County reported 51.8%. Statewide for the same period, Lake County reported the highest share (76.0%) and Davison County the lowest (48.8%).
CDC's ten-year totals for Yankton County went from 75 tests (2005 to 2014) to 118 (2008 to 2017), the share going from 68.0% to 72.9%.
Nationally, every county with a figure for the same period pools to 35.7%; Yankton County sits 37.2 points above it.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Yankton County, Geology
USGS's geologic map puts all of Yankton County's mapped land in one class: high radon potential. 96.8% of it lies in the area the map calls Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des Prairies, to which USGS gives a radon index of 14, in the high band (12 to 17).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des Prairies | Glacial drift derived largely from Cretaceous marine shale. | High | 14 | 96.8% |
| Loess-Covered Drift Plains | Pre-Illinoian and Illinoian glacial deposits, and loess. | High | 13 | 2.0% |
| Sharon Springs | Cretaceous Pierre Shale bedrock, including the uranium-bearing Sharon Springs Member. | High | 12 | 1.1% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Yankton County has more high-potential ground than South Dakota as a whole: 100% of its land against 56.7%. Of the 6 counties that border it, none has as large a share of high-potential ground; Bon Homme County comes nearest at 100%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Yankton County, Local resources
Listed radon businesses with an address in Yankton County:
The Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR) will provide 500 free Radon test kits to South Dakota Residents.
Listed radon professionals by town: Yankton
What it means
Yankton County, Questions
Over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, 72.9% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Yankton County, South Dakota were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 6.3 pCi/L. Of 23 South Dakota counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 2 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 58.5%.
Yankton County borders 6 counties: Clay County, SD, Bon Homme County, SD, Cedar County, NE, Turner County, SD, Hutchinson County, SD and Knox County, NE.
Products
Yankton County, Products
In Yankton County, 72.9% of 118 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 58.5% pooled across South Dakota. In Zone 1 the year-round level in Yankton County is the one to know: a long-term test (more than 90 days) or a monitor, with a short-term kit for a first answer.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Yankton County is in EPA Zone 1, the highest predicted radon potential. Best radon monitors for Zone 1 counties like Yankton County
Explore
Yankton County, Bordering counties
76.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 8.3 pCi/L · 487 tests · 3.9 points above Yankton County
74.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 7.2 pCi/L · 62 tests · 1.3 points above Yankton County
68.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 6.2 pCi/L · 401 tests · 4.1 points below Yankton County
66.7%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 5.8 pCi/L · 39 tests · 6.2 points below Yankton County
58.6%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 4.8 pCi/L · 58 tests · 14.3 points below Yankton County
51.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 4.2 pCi/L · 83 tests · 21.1 points below Yankton County
Yankton County, Cities and towns
The Census Bureau estimates 23,635 residents in Yankton County for July 1, 2025, 344 more than in 2020 (+1.5%). That works out to 45 people per square mile of land. Yankton alone is home to 15,816 of them, 66.9% of the total. CDC's 118 reported tests for 2008 to 2017 work out to 5.0 per 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), close to South Dakota's 6.7.
From Yankton to Utica, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Yankton County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yankton | 15,816 | +2.5% | 66.9% |
| Ireneextends beyond Yankton County | 439 | +2.6% | Counted whole |
| Gayville | 375 | −3.4% | 1.6% |
| Mission Hill | 187 | −3.1% | 0.8% |
| Volin | 157 | −0.6% | 0.7% |
| Lesterville | 110 | Level | 0.5% |
| Utica | 69 | −2.8% | 0.3% |
7 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025). A place that extends beyond Yankton County is counted whole, so it has no share.
Yankton County, Homes
Of Yankton County's 10,497 homes, 71% are detached houses, against 67% across South Dakota; 14% are in buildings of five or more homes. Half of its homes were built before 1976, close to South Dakota's 1979: 30% date from before 1960 and 20% from 2000 or later. 72% of occupied homes are lived in by their owner (South Dakota: 69%); in the rest a tenant can run a test, but a fix is the landlord's to make.
| Homes | Yankton County | South Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 10,497 | 402,364 |
| Detached houses | 71% | 67% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 14% | 16% |
| Mobile homes | 5% | 8% |
| Built before 1960 | 30% | 29% |
| Built since 2000 | 20% | 28% |
| Middle year built | 1976 | 1979 |
| Owner-occupied | 72% | 69% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.