
Long-term kit![]()
RL116 long-term radon test kit
- Lab fee extra
Method: Alpha track
In home: 90 days to 12 months
Locations and reports
EPA puts Kingsbury County in Zone 1, its highest radon zone, and high results are common there: 68.2% of the 44 radon tests reported to CDC (2008 to 2017, laboratory totals) came back at or above 4 pCi/L. Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
68.2%
9.7 pts above SD
44 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
7.4pCi/L
Action level reached
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
44
20th of 23 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 1
Highest potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts over 4 pCi/L indoors
Rank in SD
7 of 23
Middle half
By share, of 23 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Kingsbury County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 7.4 pCi/L
At or above 4 pCi/L
This result is at or above 4 pCi/L. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher. Kingsbury County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Kingsbury County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
EPA puts all of Kingsbury County in
USGS geologic potential: High across 100% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
Of 44 pre-mitigation tests reported to CDC, not homes in this area.
| Result band | Tests Measured | Share Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Under 2 pCi/L | 8 | 18.2% |
| 2 to 4 pCi/L | 6 | 13.6% |
| 4 pCi/L and above | 30 | 68.2% |
These are the 44 tests reported to CDC for Kingsbury County over 2008 to 2017 (laboratory totals), many from homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: they describe the county's reported tests, not this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2008 to 2017, laboratory. Measured data period: 2005 to 2017 (every CDC figure on file).
Kingsbury County, Compared
More than half: 68.2% of the 44 radon tests reported to CDC for Kingsbury County over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals read at least 4 pCi/L. That places it 7th of 23 South Dakota counties with 30 or more tests for the same period. That is 9.7 points above the 58.5% pooled from 62 South Dakota counties.
The median result, 7.4 pCi/L, sits above EPA's 4 pCi/L action level, and the top reported result was 24.7 pCi/L. The rest split 18.2% under 2 pCi/L and 13.6% from 2 to 4 (South Dakota: 23.6% and 17.9%). Zone 1 on EPA's map (predicted average above 4 pCi/L) and a 68.2% share point the same way here.
2 of its 3 bordering counties with figures ran higher, led by Lake County at 76.0%; Beadle County reported 59.3%. Statewide for the same period, Lake County reported the highest share (76.0%) and Davison County the lowest (48.8%).
CDC's ten-year totals for Kingsbury County went from 29 tests (2005 to 2014) to 44 (2008 to 2017), the share going from 75.9% to 68.2%.
Nationally, every county with a figure for the same period pools to 35.7%; Kingsbury County sits 32.5 points above it.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Kingsbury County, Geology
USGS's geologic map puts all of Kingsbury County's mapped land in one class: high radon potential. All of it lies in the area the map calls Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des Prairies, to which USGS gives a radon index of 14, in the high band (12 to 17).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri Coteau/James River Lowland/Coteau des Prairies | Glacial drift derived largely from Cretaceous marine shale. | High | 14 | 99.9% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Kingsbury County has more high-potential ground than South Dakota as a whole: 100% of its land against 56.7%. Of the 7 counties that border it, none has as large a share of high-potential ground; Beadle County comes nearest at 100%.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Kingsbury County, Local resources
The Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources (DANR) will provide 500 free Radon test kits to South Dakota Residents.
What it means
Kingsbury County, Questions
Over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals, 68.2% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Kingsbury County, South Dakota were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 7.4 pCi/L. Of 23 South Dakota counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 6 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 58.5%.
Kingsbury County borders 7 counties: Miner County, Hamlin County, Lake County, Brookings County, Clark County, Sanborn County and Beadle County.
Products
Kingsbury County, Products
In Kingsbury County, 68.2% of 44 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 58.5% pooled across South Dakota. In Zone 1 the year-round level in Kingsbury County is the one to know: a long-term test (more than 90 days) or a monitor, with a short-term kit for a first answer.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Kingsbury County is in EPA Zone 1, the highest predicted radon potential. Best radon monitors for Zone 1 counties like Kingsbury County
Explore
Kingsbury County, Bordering counties
77.8%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 5.9 pCi/L · 9 tests · 9.6 points above Kingsbury County
76.9%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 6.3 pCi/L · 13 tests · 8.7 points above Kingsbury County
76.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 8.5 pCi/L · 50 tests · 7.8 points above Kingsbury County
71.4%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 5.5 pCi/L · 7 tests · 3.2 points above Kingsbury County
68.5%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 6.6 pCi/L · 356 tests · 0.3 points above Kingsbury County
59.3%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 4.8 pCi/L · 54 tests · 8.9 points below Kingsbury County
50.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 3.9 pCi/L · 4 tests · 18.2 points below Kingsbury County
Kingsbury County, Cities and towns
The Census Bureau estimates 5,284 residents in Kingsbury County for July 1, 2025, 84 more than in 2020 (+1.6%). Spread over its land, that is 6.3 people to the square mile. No town dominates: De Smet, the largest, has 1,032 residents, 19.5% of the total. CDC's 44 reported tests for 2008 to 2017 work out to 8.3 per 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), close to South Dakota's 6.7.
From De Smet to Bancroft, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Kingsbury County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| De Smet | 1,032 | −3.2% | 19.5% |
| Arlingtonextends beyond Kingsbury County | 926 | Level | Counted whole |
| Lake Preston | 605 | +3.1% | 11.4% |
| Iroquoisextends beyond Kingsbury County | 294 | −1.3% | Counted whole |
| Badger | 137 | +5.4% | 2.6% |
| Oldham | 121 | −0.8% | 2.3% |
| Erwin | 41 | +5.1% | 0.8% |
| Hetland | 20 | Level | 0.4% |
| Bancroft | 13 | +8.3% | 0.2% |
9 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025). A place that extends beyond Kingsbury County is counted whole, so it has no share.
Kingsbury County, Homes
Kingsbury County is a place of houses on their own lots: 84% of its 2,647 homes are detached single-family houses, against 67% across South Dakota. The homes are older than South Dakota's as a whole: half were built before 1967 (1979 for South Dakota), and 44% date from before 1960. Owners live in 81% of the occupied homes (South Dakota: 69%), so for most households a test and a fix are their own to order.
| Homes | Kingsbury County | South Dakota |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 2,647 | 402,364 |
| Detached houses | 84% | 67% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 5% | 16% |
| Mobile homes | 8% | 8% |
| Built before 1960 | 44% | 29% |
| Built since 2000 | 20% | 28% |
| Middle year built | 1967 | 1979 |
| Owner-occupied | 81% | 69% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.