
Short-term kit![]()
Radon Short Term Test Kit short-term charcoal radon test kit, lab fee included
- Lab fee included
Method: Charcoal
In home: 2 to 7 days
Locations and reports
EPA puts Robeson County in Zone 3, its lowest radon zone, and only 1 radon test from it is on file with CDC (2022). Homes with elevated levels occur in all three zones, so only a test measures yours.
Data checked By Radon411Methodology
Share at 4+ pCi/L
3.8%
18.8 pts below NC
53 tests, 2008 to 2017
Median result
0.8pCi/L
Below action level
Midpoint of the tests, 2008 to 2017
Tests reported
53
67th of 75 by tests
Reported to CDC before any fix, 2008 to 2017
EPA radon zone
Zone 3
Lower potential
1 highest, 3 lowest
EPA predicts under 2 pCi/L indoors
Rank in NC
61 of 75
Lowest quarter
By share, of 75 with 30+ tests
Read a result for Robeson County
EPA’s own thresholds; the figures are the area’s, never this home’s.
EPA’s reading of 0.8 pCi/L
Below 2 pCi/L
This result is below 2 pCi/L, the level at which EPA says a fix should be considered. Robeson County's median reported result, 2008 to 2017.
The data
Robeson County, At a glance
Predicted: EPA radon zone
USGS geologic potential: Low across 100% of the county's area
Predicted: EPA Map of Radon Zones
Measured: tests reported to CDC
| Year | Share of reported tests at or above 4 pCi/L |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0% |
2022: 0.0%. Across these years the share ran from 0.0% to 0.0%. Each column counts radon tests reported to CDC that year, not homes.
Only 1 test was reported to CDC for Robeson County over 2022, and tests are often run on homes being sold or already suspected of a problem: so few describe neither the county nor this house.
Measured: CDC tracking data. Figure above: 2022. Measured data period: 2005 to 2022 (every CDC figure on file).
Robeson County, Compared
Only 2 of 53 radon tests reported for Robeson County over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L (3.8%). The median result, 0.8 pCi/L, sits below 2, well under EPA's 4 pCi/L action level, and the top reported result was 9.1 pCi/L.
The newest figure, in 2022, counts only 1 test (0.0% at or above 4 pCi/L), too few to compare, so this reading uses the 53-test figure.
Across 99 North Carolina counties pooled together, 22.6% of tests reached that level, so Robeson County runs 18.8 points below its state. Against the national pool of 35.7%, the gap is 31.9 points lower. Its place in the state: 61st of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period.
Zone 3 on EPA's map (predicted average under 2 pCi/L) and a 3.8% share point the same way here. Of 4 neighbours with a figure, none reported a larger share at or above 4 pCi/L; the spread is 0.0% (Columbus County) to 3.2% (Scotland County).
Below the action level, 43 tests (81.1%) came in under 2 pCi/L, against 55.6% statewide, and 8 tests (15.1%) fell between 2 and 4, against 21.8% statewide. USGS geology rates 100% of the county's land low radon potential.
The busiest year on file was 2020, with 15 tests reported; the quietest, 2022, had 1.
Pooled shares: Radon411's sum of CDC's county counts for one period.
Robeson County, Geology
USGS's geologic map puts all of Robeson County's mapped land in one class: low radon potential. 99.5% of it lies in the area the map calls Inner Coastal Plain, to which USGS gives a radon index of 8, in the low band (5 to 8).
| Area | The rock, in USGS's words | Potential | Radon index | Share of land |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Coastal Plain | Fossiliferous clay and sand, shelly sand, sandy marl, and limestone. | Low | 8 | 99.5% |
| Upper and Middle Coastal Plain | Tertiary coastal plain sandy and silty sediments and marsh deposits. | Low | 8 | 0.5% |
Names, descriptions and indexes: U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Radon Potential Map (2025). Shares: Radon411, from the map cut to the boundary.
Across North Carolina 1.3% of the land is rated high; none of Robeson County's is. None of the 8 counties that border it has any moderate-potential ground either.
The map rates the ground, not the air in any home.
Local help
Robeson County, Local resources
The North Carolina Radon Program is presently developing a Radon Proficiency Program as directed by Session Law 2023-91 House Bill 782 .
What it means
Robeson County, Questions
In 2022, 0.0% of the radon tests reported to CDC for Robeson County, North Carolina were at or above 4 pCi/L, and the median reported pre-mitigation result was 0.1 pCi/L. Of 75 North Carolina counties with 30 or more tests for the same period, 60 reported a higher share; pooled, the state comes to 22.6%.
Robeson County borders 8 counties: Dillon County, SC, Scotland County, NC, Hoke County, NC, Marlboro County, SC, Bladen County, NC, Cumberland County, NC, Columbus County, NC and Horry County, SC.
Products
Robeson County, Products
In Robeson County, 3.8% of 53 tests reported to CDC over the 2008 to 2017 laboratory totals reached 4 pCi/L, against 22.6% pooled across North Carolina. Zone 3 is the lowest label, yet homes at or above 4 pCi/L occur in every zone: a short-term kit (2 to 90 days) is the quick first check in Robeson County.
Test kits and monitors: 1 of 3
Explore
Robeson County, Bordering counties
3.2%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 1.0 pCi/L · 31 tests · 0.6 points below Robeson County
1.9%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.7 pCi/L · 160 tests · 1.9 points below Robeson County
0.9%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.6 pCi/L · 106 tests · 2.9 points below Robeson County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.3 pCi/L · 18 tests · 3.8 points below Robeson County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.8 pCi/L · 19 tests · 3.8 points below Robeson County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.9 pCi/L · 7 tests · 3.8 points below Robeson County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.1 pCi/L · 14 tests · 3.8 points below Robeson County
0.0%at or above 4 pCi/L
Median 0.1 pCi/L · 31 tests · 3.8 points below Robeson County
Robeson County, Cities and towns
The Census Bureau estimates 119,941 residents in Robeson County for July 1, 2025, 3,961 more than in 2020 (+3.4%). That works out to 127 people per square mile of land. No town dominates: Lumberton, the largest, has 18,955 residents, 15.8% of the total. Reported testing is thin here: 53 tests over 2008 to 2017, or 0.4 for every 1,000 residents (2025 estimate), where North Carolina as a whole comes to 6.5.
From Lumberton to Orrum, CDC publishes no figure by town: each reads Robeson County's.
| Place | Residents | Since 2020 | Share of residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lumberton | 18,955 | +0.3% | 15.8% |
| Red Springsextends beyond Robeson County | 3,216 | +4.2% | Counted whole |
| Pembroke | 2,888 | +2.7% | 2.4% |
| Fairmont | 2,231 | +2.0% | 1.9% |
| Maxtonextends beyond Robeson County | 2,149 | +2.2% | Counted whole |
| St. Pauls | 2,109 | +2.8% | 1.8% |
| Rowland | 906 | +2.3% | 0.8% |
| Parkton | 514 | +2.8% | 0.4% |
| Rennert | 294 | +5.4% | 0.2% |
| Proctorville | 122 | +2.5% | 0.1% |
| Marietta | 111 | +3.7% | Under 0.1% |
| McDonald | 95 | +2.2% | Under 0.1% |
15 incorporated places, as listed in the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2020 place reference files. “(part)” marks a place that extends into another county. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau population estimates for July 1, 2025 (Vintage 2025). A place that extends beyond Robeson County is counted whole, so it has no share.
Robeson County, Homes
Mobile homes are 38% of Robeson County's 48,874 homes and detached houses 51%, against 65% across North Carolina. Half of its homes were built before 1985, close to North Carolina's 1990: 15% date from before 1960 and 20% from 2000 or later. 66% of occupied homes are lived in by their owner (North Carolina: 66%); in the rest a tenant can run a test, but a fix is the landlord's to make.
| Homes | Robeson County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Housing units | 48,874 | 4,815,195 |
| Detached houses | 51% | 65% |
| In buildings of 5 or more | 4% | 14% |
| Mobile homes | 38% | 11% |
| Built before 1960 | 15% | 14% |
| Built since 2000 | 20% | 33% |
| Middle year built | 1985 | 1990 |
| Owner-occupied | 66% | 66% |
Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2019 to 2023: estimates from a sample of homes, looser for a small place. Shares by Radon411.