Skip to content
$5

County radon report

Get it

ProductsProducts / Evidence

Independent accuracy results for radon monitors, explained

By Radon411 Editorial TeamUpdated 13 min readHow we research

Short answer

The main public, independent test of consumer radon monitors is C-NRPP's annual comparison in Canada, which in 2024/25 exposed each model to known radon levels in a reference chamber for four 7-day rounds and graded it A to E by measurement error. Six models were approved with an average of B or better, but only models whose makers entered were tested, and the units were Canadian versions.

Key takeaways

  • The main public, independent test of consumer radon monitors is C-NRPP's annual comparison in Canada. Its 2024/25 round approved six models.
  • C-NRPP puts each monitor in a reference radon chamber for four 7-day rounds and grades it A to E by its measurement error. A recommended monitor averaged B or better.
  • Only models whose makers entered were tested, and the units were Canadian versions. A monitor missing from the results has no independent result, which is not the same as failing.
  • A 2024 field study found seven consumer monitors within 5% to 16% of a calibrated reference over 54 days, though some took hours to react; a 2026 study found a Lüft's daily averages matched a calibrated professional monitor.
  • However good the device, the number to act on is the long-term average. Run a monitor for at least 3 months.

What counts as an independent accuracy result

Every radon monitor box carries an accuracy claim. An independent accuracy result is different: someone with no stake in the sale exposes the device to a known radon level and reports how close it came. For consumer monitors, most of these results come from the Canadian National Radon Proficiency Program (C-NRPP), which runs a regular series of performance tests so that Canadians can compare monitors on performance alone. Health Canada runs its own testing alongside it and recalls devices that fail.

This page explains how that testing works, what the grades mean, which monitors were approved, what two peer-reviewed studies add, and the limits of all of it for a home in the United States. For every monitor we cover, with its evidence status beside it, see radon detectors and monitors. For devices that failed, see recalled and not-approved radon monitors.

The independent evidence on consumer radon monitors, and what each kind can tell you
Kind of evidenceWhat it doesWhat it can tell youWhat it cannot
C-NRPP's annual comparisonFour 7-day rounds in a reference radon chamber; a grade per roundHow a model performed against a known level, in controlled conditionsHow your unit performs in your house; anything about models not entered
Health Canada testingTests new models at its Ottawa lab; recalls those that failWhich models measure radon inaccuratelyHow models that passed compare with each other
Published field studiesRun monitors beside a calibrated reference in real rooms for weeks or monthsHow close the averages come, and how fast monitors reactResults for models the study did not include
The maker's stated accuracyA claim from the makerWhat the maker promises, under what conditionsAnything independent

How C-NRPP tests a consumer radon monitor

C-NRPP's testing-process document (last revised 5 June 2025) describes the method. The work is done at the Radiation Safety Institute of Canada's National Radon Chamber in Saskatoon, a 12 cubic meter walk-in chamber that is certified as a secondary reference radon chamber under AARST's National Radon Proficiency Program (certificate SC 1005). The chamber's radon level is the yardstick each monitor's results are compared with.

  1. The maker enters

    Device manufacturers are invited to take part and send three of the same model. Entry is by registration, so a model is only tested if its maker signs it up.

  2. The units arrive sealed

    All monitors are shipped unopened to the chamber. Staff log the make, model and serial number, check for shipping damage, read the manual, install any app and confirm each unit works.

  3. Four rounds of exposure

    Each round lasts 7 days, in four different sets of conditions: two near Canada's guideline level (one at winter and one at summer temperature and humidity) and two at higher radon levels.

  4. A measurement error for each device

    C-NRPP compares each monitor's results with the chamber and calculates its Measurement Error, a single figure that combines precision and accuracy.

  5. A grade for each round

    Each monitor gets a letter grade, A to E, for each round. Those with an average grade of B or better are recommended.

C-NRPP's 2024/25 test rounds, as run (becquerels per cubic meter as C-NRPP reports them; picocuries per liter are our conversion)
RoundTarget (Bq/m3)Actual radonTemperatureHumidityLength
Round 1 (winter indoor conditions)200218 Bq/m3 (about 5.9 pCi/L, calculated)23° C28% RH7 days
Round 2 (summer, little or no air conditioning)200210 Bq/m3 (about 5.7 pCi/L, calculated)29° C70% RH7 days
Round 3 (higher level)400436 Bq/m3 (about 11.8 pCi/L, calculated)23° C36% RH7 days
Round 4 (high level)1,0001201 Bq/m3 (about 32.5 pCi/L, calculated)23° C35% RH7 days

C-NRPP sets two rounds at 200 because that is the Canadian radon guideline level, about 5.4 . The summer round uses conditions representing homes with no air conditioning or limited air conditioning, and the two higher rounds, at 400 and 1,000 Bq/m3, test how a monitor performs across a range of radon levels. EPA's in the United States is lower than Canada's guideline: EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher.

Scale of radon levels from 0 to 10 pCi/L marking EPA's 2 pCi/L level, where EPA says to consider fixing, and its 4 pCi/L action level, where EPA says to fix the home, with each mark also in Bq/m³.
Read this figure as text
  • Below 2 pCi/L (below 74 Bq/m³)Below both of EPA's guidance levels.
  • 2 to 4 pCi/L (74 Bq/m³ to 148 Bq/m³)EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L.
  • At or above 4 pCi/L (148 Bq/m³ and up)EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher.
The two U.S. guidance levels with their becquerel equivalents, for comparing C-NRPP's chamber levels.

What the A to E grades mean

C-NRPP grades each monitor in each round by its Measurement Error, a single percentage that reflects both how close the monitor's readings were to the chamber's level and how consistent they were. The bands come straight from C-NRPP's detailed results:

C-NRPP's performance grades by measurement error
GradeMeasurement errorWhat it means in practice
A10% or lessThe closest band C-NRPP uses
BMore than 10%, up to 20%An average of B or better across the rounds is C-NRPP's bar for recommending a monitor
CMore than 20%, up to 30%A C in one round can still average out to a B
DMore than 30%, up to 40%Well outside the recommended range
EMore than 40%The lowest band

A manufacturer's accuracy figure and a C-NRPP grade are not the same measure. The maker's figure is a promise under conditions the maker chooses, such as ±10% after 7 days at 200 Bq/m3. The grade is C-NRPP's own result, under conditions C-NRPP sets. Read the maker's figure for the conditions it names, and the grade for what an independent test found.

Which consumer monitors C-NRPP approved in 2024/25

C-NRPP's consumer monitor page lists six models as approved in the 2024/25 round, published May 2025. The table repeats what C-NRPP prints for each, including the manufacturer's stated accuracy, which is the maker's claim and not C-NRPP's finding. Models are in A to Z order; the order is not a recommendation.

Consumer radon monitors approved in C-NRPP's 2024/25 evaluation, as C-NRPP lists them (A to Z)
Monitor, as C-NRPP names itManufacturer's stated accuracy, as C-NRPP prints itReadingsPower
Airthings Corentium Home±10% (after 7 days at 200 Bq/m3), ±5% after 2 months of monitoring12 hours, 24 hours and 7 days; the first reading takes 24 hoursBattery
Airthings ViewAfter 30 days at 200 Bq/m3, ±10% on the 7 day average and +/- 5% on the 2 month averageHourlyBattery or plug-in (USB-C)
Aranet RN+±8% accuracy of 24 h, 7 d and 30 d averagesCan be set to show 10 min, 24 h, 7 d or 30 dBattery
Ecosense EcoQube±10% at 370 Bq/m³ after 10 hours of measurementMeasures every 10 minutes; shows an hourly rolling averagePlug-in
Ecosense RadonEye RD200±10% at 370 Bq/m³ after 10 hours of measurementMeasures every 10 minutes; shows an hourly rolling averagePlug-in
SunRadon Luft±10% (after 7 days at 200 Bq/m3)Hourly; the first reading takes 90 minutesPlug-in

The earlier round: C-NRPP's 2023 report

The 2024/25 round was the second year of C-NRPP's project. Its 2023 report listed seven consumer monitors in its table of devices tested, marking these as passing its performance test: the Airthings Corentium Home, Wave Plus and View Plus, the Ecosense EcoQube, EcoBlue and RadonEye RD200, and the SunRadon Luft. It listed two devices it did not recommend, the Air Steward and the Radon Guard.

Which consumer monitors appear in which C-NRPP round (A to Z)
Monitor2023 report2024/25 round
Airthings Corentium HomeIn the table of devices testedApproved
Airthings View / View PlusView Plus in the table of devices tested"Airthings View" approved
Airthings Wave PlusIn the table of devices testedNot included
Aranet RN+Not listedApproved
Ecosense EcoBlueIn the table of devices testedNot included
Ecosense EcoQubeIn the table of devices testedApproved
Ecosense RadonEye RD200In the table of devices testedApproved
SunRadon LuftIn the table of devices testedApproved

A model that appears in 2023 but not in 2024/25 was not retested in the later round; nothing in C-NRPP's 2024/25 material says it failed. We show the most recent result for each model and say which round it came from.

Why a monitor can be missing from the results

Many monitors sold in the United States have no C-NRPP result at all. There are three ordinary reasons, and none of them is a failed test:

  • The maker did not enter it. C-NRPP's comparison is by registration: device manufacturers sign up for each annual round.
  • It is new. A model released after a round closed cannot appear in that round's results.
  • It is still under review. A device can be missing from both lists because it is still being tested, or is under review or regulatory action.

That is why every monitor on our hub carries one of three labels: approved in C-NRPP's 2024/25 evaluation, not included in C-NRPP's 2024/25 evaluation, or not approved. We never write "unverified" or "inaccurate" for a monitor that simply was not tested. Where a monitor has no independent result, we show the maker's own claims, attributed to the maker.

What two peer-reviewed field studies found

Chamber tests control the conditions. Field studies run monitors in real rooms beside a calibrated reference instrument, which shows how they behave when temperature, humidity and radon change on their own. We found two recent studies that name consumer models, each published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Two published field comparisons of consumer radon monitors
StudyMonitors and referenceSetting and lengthWhat it found
Field study, 2024EcoQube, RadonEye, RadonEye Plus2, Spirit, ViewPlus, ViewRadon and WavePlus, against an AlphaGUARD calibrated at a laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC 17025A natural radiation laboratory, field conditions, 1 July to 23 August 2023 (54 days)Over the whole period each monitor was within 5% to 16% of the reference, and the difference was not statistically significant for all but one. Response times ranged from 1 to 15 hours; between 1 and 3 hours behind the reference for the EcoQube, RadonEye, RadonEye Plus2 and Spirit, and 5 to 15 hours for the ViewPlus, ViewRadon and WavePlus. Missing records ranged from 1% to 19% of the data.
School field study, 2026Consumer-grade Lüft against the annually and manufacturer calibrated, industrial-grade Model 1028 XPSix rooms of a school in Utah, about 29 weeks in 2024The mean difference in 24-hour moving average radon was -0.05 pCi/L (95% confidence interval -0.24 to 0.14), with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.92. The study concluded the Lüft gave valid 24-hour moving averages for radon, though not for carbon dioxide, humidity, temperature or VOCs.

Two lessons carry over to a home. First, the averages of the monitors studied came reasonably close to a reference over weeks, which is the number that matters for a decision. Second, some monitors take many hours to react to a change, so an hourly figure on the screen can lag what is happening in the room. Neither study tested every model sold today, and neither is a rating of a brand.

How to get a reading you can rely on from any monitor

An accurate monitor still gives a misleading answer if it runs for a few days in the wrong room. Radon levels vary from day to day and week to week, a few days can read much lower or much higher than your real average, and so a monitor should stay in place for at least 3 months.

  1. Pick the right room

    A room occupied for at least 4 hours each day, on the lowest lived-in level of the home. Not a kitchen, bathroom, laundry or storage room.

  2. Place it well

    Off the floor, away from an exterior wall, out of direct sunlight and away from air currents from heating and cooling vents, doors, fans and windows, and away from electronic or network devices. See where to place a radon test.

  3. Run it through the heating season

    At least 3 months, preferably in the heating season, when indoor levels are typically highest. Canada's guidance asks for at least 91 days of the test to fall in the heating season.

  4. Live normally

    Do not change how you live in the home during a long-term test.

  5. Decide on the long-term average

    Use the long-term average when deciding whether to mitigate. Each monitor averages differently, so read the maker's guide. If you have less than 91 days of data, follow up with a long-term radon test.

Table comparing a short-term radon test, a long-term radon test and a continuous radon monitor: how long each runs and what each is for.
Read this figure as text
TestHow long it runsWhat it is for
Short-term testStays in the home from 2 to 90 days, depending on the device, and for a minimum of 48 hours.A faster screening result. Because radon levels vary from day to day and season to season, it is less likely than a long-term test to tell you the year-round average.
Long-term testStays in the home for more than 90 days.It is more likely than a short-term test to tell you the home's year-round average radon level.
Continuous monitorLogs readings for the whole test, run as a short-term or a long-term test under the same durations in EPA guidance.Logs a graph over time, so you can see trends and spot anomalies rather than a single number.
Short-term kits, long-term kits and continuous monitors: how long each runs and what each is for.

What this means in the United States

C-NRPP's work answers a Canadian question against a Canadian guideline. U.S. guidance comes from EPA. EPA recommends fixing a home when the radon level is 4 pCi/L or higher. EPA recommends considering a fix when the level is between 2 and 4 pCi/L. In the United States, a stays in a home for two days to 90 days and a for more than 90 days, because radon levels tend to vary from day to day and season to season.

By those definitions, a consumer monitor that has run for more than 90 days has made a long-term measurement; before then, its average is a short-term one. If the result is for a home sale, check what the contract and your state accept before relying on a consumer monitor: C-NRPP does not approve these devices for use by radon measurement professionals. See radon testing and radon test kits.

Calculated by Radon411

5.4 pCi/L

Canada's guideline of 200 Bq/m3 in U.S. units, our conversion at 37 Bq/m3 per pCi/L

Questions about radon monitor accuracy

Are home radon detectors accurate?

The ones that have been independently tested and passed can be. Every consumer monitor C-NRPP featured in its 2024/25 round averaged a grade of B or better, meaning a measurement error of 20% or less, and two field studies found monitors within 5% to 16% of a calibrated reference over weeks. Several cheap monitors, on the other hand, were recalled for reading radon inaccurately.

Which radon monitors passed independent testing?

In C-NRPP's 2024/25 round: the Airthings Corentium Home and Airthings View, the Aranet RN+, the Ecosense EcoQube and RadonEye RD200, and the SunRadon Luft, all tested as Canadian versions.

What does a C-NRPP grade of A or B mean?

A means the monitor's measurement error in that round was 10% or less; B means more than 10% and up to 20%. C-NRPP recommends monitors whose average grade across the four rounds is B or better.

Why is a popular radon monitor not in C-NRPP's results?

Usually because its maker did not enter it, or it is newer than the latest round. Makers register each year. A monitor missing from the results has no independent result either way; it has not failed.

Is the manufacturer's accuracy figure the same as a test result?

No. A figure such as ±10% after 7 days at 200 Bq/m3 is the maker's claim under conditions the maker names. C-NRPP prints those claims beside its own approval, but its grades come from its own chamber tests.

Does C-NRPP test the U.S. versions of radon monitors?

C-NRPP tested units for the Canadian market. We have not confirmed that the U.S. version of any model is identical to the unit C-NRPP tested.

How long should a radon monitor run before I trust the number?

At least 3 months, preferably in the heating season. With less than 91 days of data, follow up with a long-term radon test.

Why does my radon monitor jump around from hour to hour?

Radon itself varies from day to day and week to week, and some monitors react to a change hours after it happens. That is why the decision rests on the long-term average, not an hourly or daily figure.

Can I use a consumer radon monitor for a home sale?

C-NRPP does not approve consumer monitors for use by radon measurement professionals. Before relying on one for a sale, check what the contract and your state's rules accept, and see radon testing for home buyers and sellers.

Can a consumer radon monitor be calibrated?

No. These devices cannot be professionally calibrated. The field studies above compared them with professional instruments that are calibrated, such as an AlphaGUARD and a Model 1028 XP.

What is the difference between a radon detector and an electronic radon monitor?

Mostly the name. The current Canadian term is electronic radon monitor (ERM), for what used to be called a digital detector. On this site we use "radon detector" and "radon monitor" for the same kind of device.

Is a lab-analyzed test kit more accurate than a monitor?

Both passive and active devices can measure accurately when used to protocol. A kit gives one average for its test period after a lab reads it; a monitor gives a running average you can watch. For a long-term answer, either works if it runs long enough. See radon test kits.